the weblog of Alan Knox

If a person has called on the name of the Lord, I must be willing to fellowship with them

Posted by on Apr 6, 2011 in fellowship, guest blogger, unity | 5 comments

If a person has called on the name of the Lord, I must be willing to fellowship with them

Last week, I asked the question, “What caused you to start studying the church?” There were several great comments on that post. Also, because of that post, I met several new people.

One of the people who commented on that post was Will from “” As a follow-up question to one of his comments, I asked Will if he was still able to fellowship with people who are part of institutional churches.

I loved Will’s reply, and I asked him if I could highlight it here as a post. So, here is Will’s comment:

Just because I no longer attend the traditional institutional church, does not mean that I don’t fellowship very regularly; actually significantly more than I did while in the institutional church. When I tell people that, the ones who most often have a difficult time grasping the concept are those who are still involved in these traditional institutional systems.

On one of my blogs I have a caveat that says that while I have no use for institutional church systems, the people within those systems I continue to love and care for as much as God enables me to (you can find those blogs on my website). But I still haven’t answered your question. Unfortunately, sometimes people misunderstand and think that my speaking against an institution is a word spoken against them. When this happens, it is usually because so much of their identity is wrapped up with that “place.” Therein is the problem; Christianity was never supposed to be about a “place.” Jesus isn’t a “place.”

Am I still able to fellowship with those who don’t share my views? Not only am I able to, but I often do exactly that. The only initial difficulty, normally, is on their part, not mine. While I’m open to fellowship with whomever is interested, regardless of their background or denominational affiliation (and I totally disagree with denominationalism), they are the ones who usually tend to have issues with it.

Why? I think it has to do with the fact that many people still cannot get their heads around the fact that there are many active and God-fearing and Jesus-loving and fellowship-seeking Christians out there who no longer go to institutional churches. They rationalize that, if you are a Christian, then you “go” to church. I would argue, on the other hand, that if you are a Christian, then you “are” the church. How can you “go” to that which you “are?”

Most of those I fellowship with on a regular basis have long since stopped going to institutional churches. Having said that, there are also a number of believers who, while still regularly going to those churches, also gather with us on a semi-regular basis. I also am involved with the Christian motorcycling community, most of whom also still go to institutional churches. This has not created a problem for me, nor for most of them. We have all been saved and love to spend time together.

What constitutes a saved believer? Institutional church affiliation? Belonging to one denomination over another one? Tithing? Mode of baptism? Speaking in tongues, or, not speaking in them? None of the above. Rather it is simply, as Peter said in Acts 2:21, “And EVERYONE who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.” So the criteria for fellowship is one: has that person called on the name of the Lord? If so, I MUST be willing to fellowship with them. This is not an option. Nor is it simply a suggestion.

John 3:8 says, “The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit.” If we are truly born of the Spirit, and listening to Him, it may be that on Sunday morning He leads us to such-and-such an institutional church. It may also be that He leads us to a nursing home to spend time with an elderly saint. It may be that God leads us to a park, because that is where He will sovereignly cross our path with someone else that He wants us to talk to. The point is, are we really open to going where he leads us to go and when He calls us to do so? I wonder sometimes.

There is a great video (about 10 minutes long) by Simple Churches. If you haven’t seen it yet, it is on my homepage of my website. I think it will answer a lot of questions that your readers may have on this topic.

Hope I’ve answered your question. Sorry if this dragged on too much. I guess you never really take the sermon out of the preacher.

God bless.
Your brother in Christ,

Those of you who have read my blog for a while know how important unity among the body of Christ is to me. Will’s comment is a great example of how brothers and sisters can still reach out to and fellowship with those who disagree with them.

May we all learn from Will’s example.


Comments are closed. If you would like to discuss this post, send an email to alan [at] alanknox [dot] net.

  1. 4-6-2011

    Great stuff. Many of our friends are still in some sort of institutional church. The hard part for me is that being open to fellowship sometimes takes more work on our part but as you blogged a while ago that kind of comes with the territory.

  2. 4-6-2011


    Yes. We must be willing to fellowship with others and provide others opportunities to share our lives, even if the willingness and opportunities are not reciprocated.


  3. 4-6-2011

    I like Will’s post.

    Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: and every one that loveth him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of him. 1 John 5:1

    I have an off-topic question (or maybe it isn’t). Is “call upon the name of the Lord” a single event? I know most of my background (Southern Baptist) seemed to teach it as so, especially in reference to Rom. 10:13 on the Romans Roadâ„¢ (to the neglect of Acts 2, Joel 2). Other examples in scripture (1 Cor. 1:2 and 2 Tim 2:22) don’t seem to use this phrase in the past tense (“called” vs. “call” in English). It seems to be either future or ongoing present. Is there a distinction here and if so, does that change anything about our fellowship?

  4. 4-6-2011


    I can only repeat your words,”May we all learn from Will’s example”.

  5. 4-6-2011


    I would say that a person who starts calling on the name of the Lord will continue to do so.

    Aussie John,

    I’m learning… I’m learning…