the weblog of Alan Knox

Church Polity – Introduction

Posted by on Oct 11, 2010 in elders, office | 4 comments

Church Polity – Introduction

According to the great, all-knowing Wikipedia:

Ecclesiastical polity is the operational and governance structure of a church or Christian denomination. It also denotes the ministerial structure of the church and the authority relationships between churches. Polity is closely related to Ecclesiology, the study of doctrine and theology relating to church organization.

Theopedia provides a similar definition:

Church government (or sometimes church polity) is that branch of ecclesiology (study of the church) that addresses the organizational structure and hierarchy of the church. There are basically three types of church government that have developed in the various Christian denominations: the episcopal, the presbyterian, and the congregational.

So, church polity (or ecclesiastical polity or church government) refers to organizational or governing structure among the church. Polity is closely related to questions of hierarchy and authority. And, in fact, one’s view of ecclesiology is strong influenced by one’s view of church polity (and vice versa).

The definition from theopedia also tells us that three basic types of church government are episcopal, prebyterian, and congregational. I’ve planned a blog post about each of these three basic types of church polity. In each one, I will talk about the scriptural justification as well as the strengths and weaknesses of each type of government.

To begin with, though, I want to point out what I think is a major weakness of each of these three types of polity as they are generally practiced today. For the most part, church polity deals with organization and hierarchy. The church, however, is not an organization or hierarchy. The church is a group of people. Don’t misunderstand me: any group of people will be organized in some way, whether that organized is intentional or not, highly structured or not. Whenever two or more people get together, there will be some type of organization.

However, the organization is not the church. Too often today the organization and especially the leadership is confused as being the church. The church comes before the organization, supersedes the organization, and is more important than the organization. But, when the church acts as if organization and hierarchy and government make up the church, the growth of the church will be stunted. (I’m not talking as much about numerical growth as much as maturity growth.)

Even though the church comes before the organization, organizational and governmental issues often drive the direction of the church, even when the matters being governed are not truly “church” issues. Often, polity revolves around making other organizational decisions, which should have very little, if anything, to do with the life of the church. But, when the church puts too much emphasis on organization, these organizational issues soon take on a life of their own, and begin to take over the life of the church.

So, while organizational issues are not as important as the church itself, often the church makes organizational issues more important because of the way they handle polity, organization, structure, hierarchy, and decision making. I’ll talk a little about this in each of the three posts related to the three basic forms of church government.

Then, in the last post of this series, I will talk about a fourth form of church government, one that is not episcopal, presbyterian, or congregational. This fourth type of church polity also has scriptural roots and has strengths and weaknesses.

I look forward to your interaction in these posts.


Church Polity Series


Comments are closed. If you would like to discuss this post, send an email to alan [at] alanknox [dot] net.

  1. 10-12-2010

    great thought!

  2. 5-3-2012

    Can’t wait to see the descriptions. I think the church I was in had none, or else it was an monarchy. Which structure does that fall under?

  3. 8-23-2012


    I have been ministering in Kansas for the last 20 years. Was born again in a Baptist church(congregational) at 10, was a pastor in the earlier Vineyard years which was oddly enough Episcopal, then planted non-denominational works that were a mix of Episcopal and Presbyter. I now steward a work that we call and Equipping Ministry. All that to say that we have had many different experiences with church government.

    I have found that your ecclesiology determines your interpretation of leadership, particularly eldership. If you have an “organizational” view of the church- that it is a name, place, budget, building, etc. then you have steward/structural concept of eldership. If you have an “organic” view of the church where you believe the church to literally be a people- that is saints being built together in to a spiritual and practical fellowship that can never be confines to just a place, budget, building, etc. then you see eldership in a purely relational sense. The first has more of a ‘board mentality” the second has more of a “father of the family mentality”. The first stewards the organization and the second stewards peoples souls/lives.

    I wonder what you think of this articulation of your ecclesiology conviction determines your eldership definition.? I know that it is not exactly this black and white but they do seem to be two different trajectories of definition and function. So??? Thoughts???

    Love this subject by the way. Seems to me that it is a big deal in either empowering or quenching the growth of a spiritual church.


  4. 8-24-2012


    I think it works both ways, since one’s understanding of elders and other aspects of “polity” is part of one’s understanding of the church (ecclesiology). In my case, my understanding of the church and elders changed together.



  1. Church Polity – Episcopal | The Assembling of the Church - [...] is the second post in my series on church polity. (See my post “Church Polity – Introduction.”) In this…
  2. Church Polity – Presbyterian | The Assembling of the Church - [...] is the third post in my series on church polity. (See my posts “Church Polity – Introduction” and “Church…
  3. Church Polity – Congregational | The Assembling of the Church - [...] is the fourth post in my series on church polity. (See my posts “Church Polity – Introduction,” “Church Polity…
  4. Stayed Tuned for More on Church Polity | The Assembling of the Church - [...] far in my series on church polity, I have described the three major forms of church government: episcopal, presbyterian,…
  5. Scripture… As We Live It #126 | The Assembling of the Church - [...] honor of my series on Church Polity…) This is the 126th passage in “Scripture… As We Live [...]
  6. Church Polity – Scriptural Evidence | The Assembling of the Church - [...] far in the series, I have introduced the three primary types of church polity. (See my posts “Introduction,” “Episcopal,”…
  7. Church Polity – The Problem | The Assembling of the Church - [...] post continues my series on church polity. (See my posts “Introduction,” “Episcopal,” “Presbyterian,” and “Congregational” for [...]
  8. Church Polity – Moving Forward | The Assembling of the Church - [...] is the sixth post my series on church polity. (See my posts “Introduction,” “Episcopal,” “Presbyterian,” and “Congregational” for [...]