the weblog of Alan Knox

Discussing the church and covenants…

Posted by on Sep 7, 2007 in blog links, definition | 3 comments

My good friend Lew, at “The Pursuit“, has posted a series of email communications between himself and a friend of his in a series called “Email: Church Covenant – Part 1” (see also, “Part 2“, “Part 3“, and “Part 4“).

The biggest difference between Lew and his friend is in their understanding of the church and what role “church covenants” play in that understanding. The question is: do “church covenants” define who is the church, or do “church covenants” remind of who we are in Christ and how we are to respond to other believers in Christ?

For example, Lew asks the following questions concerning a brother or sister in Christ who does not “sign” a church covenant (in “Part 2“):

Do the other members no longer have a Biblical responsibility to that brother/sister? Has that member lost his salvation? Is he no longer welcome to fellowship with the church? Is he placed under church discipline?

Lew’s friend answers the question about church discipline in this way:

I suppose if they will not [sign the church covenant] there would be no need for formal church discipline as the person is technically no longer a member.

Thus, according to this answer, the church (that is, followers of Jesus Christ) should no longer feel responsibility toward their brother or sister in Christ because that person did not sign a church covenant.

You will not find anything like this in Scripture. We are connected to one another through our mutual relationship with Jesus Christ, not through a man-made covenant, regardless of how much biblical language we include in that covenant. Our covenant is with God. That covenant with God includes responsibilities toward all brothers and sisters that God brings into our lives.

We should all think seriously about these questions. Perhaps it would also help if we meditate on Jesus’ response to the man who asked him: “Who is my neighbor?


Comments are closed. If you would like to discuss this post, send an email to alan [at] alanknox [dot] net.

  1. 9-7-2007

    The really scary thing is how flippantly we use the word covenant. God never intended for covenants to be anything other than eternal. A broken covenant was death.

  2. 9-7-2007

    Although I agree with what Bryan just said I do think that it is fine to use Church covenants as a way of strengthening our relationship to each other. The problem you are highlighting is that we too often confuse our own organization with the eternal Church which He himself defines and rules. If someone joins our organization that is one thing- and with a covenant we can define some responsibilities for ourselves that honor God, but the Church is still the Church defined by Jesus and we must obey scripture in loving one another accordingly.

  3. 9-7-2007


    Our covenant is with God. That covenant is eternal because God created it and keeps it.


    You are correct that the problem is in confusing our organization with the church. Jesus does define the church and he places believers into our lives according to his will.