the weblog of Alan Knox

The Sacraments and the Church…

Posted by on Nov 10, 2006 in books, definition, ordinances/sacraments | 1 comment

I have been greatly challenged by Jim Peterson’s book Church Without Walls. In chapter nine, “New Boundaries for the Church,” he states, “One lesson that comes through in our discussion of history and of form and function is that the church has constantly tended toward narrowing.” What he means by this is that historical periods (i.e. the church fathers, the reformation), theological systems, denominational distinctives, and culture add limitations to our understanding of Scripture and, therefore, our understaning of the church. Here is one example:

One example is the Reformers’ treatment of the sacraments. Previously the pope had served as the unifying factor for the church. He defined the church. Since all the Reformers rejected the authority of the pope, a replacement symbol was needed. It is significant that the sacraments-particularly baptism and the Lord’s Supper-are included in virtually all of their definitions. But do they belong at all? Is that why the sacraments were given to God’s people? Is it baptism that makes a church a church? Is that why the Lord’s Supper was instituted? The sacraments were not given to define the church for us. And whenever we impose a second meaning on something in this manner, its true significance is diminished or even lost.

For the past few months, I have been pondering a definition of the church. I even had a series of blog posts about the definition of the church (Final post with links to previous posts). My definition did not include the sacraments. I believe the sacraments are very important, but I do not see where Scripture uses the sacraments to define the church. Are the sacraments something that the church does? Yes. Do the sacraments define the church? No. Is a church still a church if it does not practice the sacraments? Yes. Does a group become a church because they practice the sacraments? No.

Am I correct? If not, why not? If so, then what is the purpose of the sacraments (or ordinances, if you prefer)? Also, if I am correct, have we diminished the true significance of the sacraments?

One Comment

Comments are closed. If you would like to discuss this post, send an email to alan [at] alanknox [dot] net.

  1. 11-12-2006


    Very interesting post. I have never really considered much about the sacraments, apart from the fact that I think Christians should be purposeful in doing them. With that said, I believe you are correct in your statements.

    To answer your question, the two sacraments have two purposes in my eyes. Baptisms purpose is a public display of your obedience to Christ in salvation. The Lords Supper in remembrance of his work for us.

    Have we diminished the significance?

    Probably, maybe not so much in Baptism – although the pre-made pool might diminish our view on Baptism… However I doubt many people would agree.

    I would say significance is definitely lost with the Lord’s supper. In my eyes, a bunch of people I hardly know, sitting in a room, eating part of a cracker, and drinking a quarter shot of grape juice, hardly seems like the Lord’s last supper.



  1. The Assembling of the Church | The Sacraments and the Church - [...] a post from three years ago called “The Sacraments and the Church,” I interacted with a statement from Peterson’s …